Questions on Map and Set based on SpiderMonkey implementation

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 06:23:58 PST 2012


On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu>wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 5:19 AM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com>
> wrote:
> > On 22 January 2012 18:52, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> SpiderMonkey implementation landed today. I was looking over the commit
> >> [1] and had a question.
> >> There is a test:
> >>
> >> assertEq(Object.prototype.toString.call(new Map), "[object Map]");
> >
> > FWIW, V8 behaves the same. It's not in the spec yet, but it's the
> > behaviour you would interpolate.
>
> As was mentioned in another thread, we agreed at the F2F that we
> should be writing tests for test262 for features like Maps and Sets
> that are implemented, even before they're described in the spec.
> Unfortunately, I think only companies that have executed the
> contribution agreement for test262 can contribute, but this seems like
> a good place to start.  :)
>

Where can I find the information about the contribution agreement for
test262?

Rick



> --
> sam th
> samth at ccs.neu.edu
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120123/cc6a2d7a/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list