Does private(expr) create a private storage block?

Herby Vojčík herby at mailbox.sk
Thu Jan 19 16:29:34 PST 2012


Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Herby Vojčík <herby at mailbox.sk
> <mailto:herby at mailbox.sk>> wrote:
>
>     P.S.: I posted another thread with proposal for shortcut for
>     private(this), but it still did not reach the list (I see
>     private(this) as non-elegant, too).
>
> -1 to private(this) here too ... but specs are outdated so maybe it's
> already private.{definition} in the constructor which imo would look
> more elegant

Exactly that syntax is in my not-yet-on-the-list proposal 
(private.whatever instead of private(this).whatever).


More information about the es-discuss mailing list