Does private(expr) create a private storage block?
brendan at mozilla.com
Thu Jan 19 15:35:04 PST 2012
> Mark S. Miller <mailto:erights at google.com>
> January 19, 2012 2:38 PM
> For const classes specifically, my intention is that the "private
> state" object is "sealed", i.e., it is non-extensible and all its
> properties are non-configurable, but generally writable unless
> declared otherwise.
Hi Mark, just to clarify: we don't want any observable private state
object in any revised classes proposal. It may be that the current
proposal is a bit out of date on this, just in terms of terminology and
its possible misinterpretation.
More information about the es-discuss