Harmony modules feedback

John J Barton johnjbarton at johnjbarton.com
Mon Jan 16 21:44:09 PST 2012


On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:07 PM, James Burke <jrburke at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> I believe loader plugins are much more valuable to the end developer
> than the possible advantages under the covers to compile time wiring.
>

(I hope this is related; if not, just erase this line and the two quoted
above).

Doesn't "Script-loader" make about as much sense as literal "XML HTTP
Request"? Imagine how impoverished our Web App world would be if it had
turned out that Ajax only supported valid XML.

Shouldn't the API in
http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:module_loaders be split into
one layer that takes URL -> buffers and another that takes buffers ->
modules?  Then clever folks can do clever things with and between the two
layers.

jjb
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120116/c9bdb24b/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list