Re: Object Model Reformation – elementIn?

[Axel Rauschmayer]

>> Currently, there one can override the built-in operators via elementGet (getting via []), elementSet (setting via []) and elementDelete (`delete` operator). Wouldn’t it make sense to also provide elementIn (`in` operator)?
> 
> Probably.  It may depend upon how strongly you feel about obsoleting for-in in favor of for-of.


That would be some kind of iteration protocol(?) I’d be perfectly happy with not supporting for-in at all.

I was thinking about the relational operator `in`:

    if (key in myMap) {
        ...
    }

    if (element in mySet) {
        ...
    }

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de

home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120102/86a06196/attachment.html>