Set constructor arguments

Andrea Giammarchi andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com
Tue Feb 14 12:23:44 PST 2012


nope, Set does not even accept arguments as it is now ... does it ?

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Dean Landolt <dean at deanlandolt.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Andrea Giammarchi <
> andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> if you accept a single argument, of course, but what if you Set(..[1, 2,
>> 1]) then ?
>
>
> `Set(1, 2, 1)` then? Are you suggesting this should throw? So you'd need
> to dedupe your arguments before you construct a set with them? Isn't that a
> primary use case of sets?
>
>
>>
>> magic add through Set constructor does not sound good to me
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Peter Michaux <petermichaux at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:09 AM, Andrea Giammarchi
>>> <andrea.giammarchi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > thinking about the add behavior, where no duplicated values will be
>>> added,
>>> > this argument may cause some logic headache anyway
>>> >
>>> > Set([1, 2, 1]) what should happen ?
>>>
>>> I think that should be a set with one element. The element is an array
>>> of length three.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120214/703cc486/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list