Set constructor arguments
Michael A. Smith
michael at smith-li.com
Sun Feb 12 19:29:07 PST 2012
…But we wouldn't want to require the arguments to the set constructor
to require instantiation itself/themselves, right? If a set has to be
constructed with an Iterable, and cannot (also) be constructed with
individual atoms, then you'll end up with use cases like Set(['foo',
'bar', 'baz']), which requires two constructions, one of which is
essentially a waste. If allowing both forms of the constructor is
distasteful, then why not just go with the multiple parameters,
approach, and implement toSet() as a method on appropriate Iterables?
-Michael A. Smith
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Erik Arvidsson
<erik.arvidsson at gmail.com> wrote:
> The default argument should probably just be an iterable.
> On Feb 12, 2012 4:50 PM, "Oliver Hunt" <oliver at apple.com> wrote:
>> I saw a reference to it being modified to take an array(-like?) as a
>> parameter. While I can see an argument in favour of a single array argument
>> I can also see using a set of parameters that initially populate the set.
>> We just shouldn't allow both (and introduce another version of the horror
>> that is the Array constructor).
>> With the existence of the spread operator I think that there's a good
>> argument in favour of the multiple parameters approach.
>> On Feb 12, 2012, at 4:33 PM, Peter Michaux wrote:
>> > In the proposal, the Set constructor takes no arguments.
>> > http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:simple_maps_and_sets
>> > Could it take a list of initial elements to be included in the set?
>> > var s = new Set('alpha', 'beta');
>> > s.has('alpha'); // true
>> > I think this is a lot better than the verbosity that is
>> > var s = new Set();
>> > s.add('alpha');
>> > s.add('beta');
>> > Peter
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > es-discuss mailing list
>> > es-discuss at mozilla.org
>> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
More information about the es-discuss