barraclough at apple.com
Sun Feb 12 10:47:52 PST 2012
On Feb 10, 2012, at 11:55 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> "over-specifying", right? I am in favor of specifying __proto__ minimally in Annex B.
>> But, one thing I would like enshrined in the spec is that `"__proto__" in Object.create(null) === false`.
> For sure!
The idea of a minimal specification sounds really encouraging. It seems there are a few really key points that everyone appears to be in complete agreement on – that the __proto__ property should be a member of the Object Prototype, that this should be the only mechanism available to change an object's prototype, and that it should be configurable.
On Feb 10, 2012, at 3:16 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> I know of no implementations that reflect __proto__ as an accessor,
WebKit is using an accessor in nightly builds.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss