Nested Quasis

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Tue Feb 7 15:54:16 PST 2012


On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Waldemar Horwat <waldemar at google.com> wrote:
[...]

> To illustrate the problem, consider a simpler lexer rule:
>
> TokenSequence ::
>  Token*
>
> This will lex ainb as many things, including for example a in b.


I now understand your objection. Rather than trying to repair my way of
saying this, do you find Erik's approach clear? If so, let's just start
there. It does correspond exactly to what I've been trying to explain.


-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120207/22cef5e8/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list