lexical for-in/for-of loose end

Allen Wirfs-Brock allen at wirfs-brock.com
Mon Feb 6 11:55:53 PST 2012

On Feb 6, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:

> You make a good point: we should not overcomplicate for(let;;) at high cost. I'm happy with Andreas's proposed 0th-iter scope desugaring, modulo nagging doubts that are going away even as I type.

particularly, when somebody who really wants per loop bindings they can easily say:

{ let i;
   for (;i<n;i++; {

More information about the es-discuss mailing list