lexical for-in/for-of loose end

[Allen Wirfs-Brock]

On Feb 6, 2012, at 11:24 AM, Brendan Eich wrote:

> 
> You make a good point: we should not overcomplicate for(let;;) at high cost. I'm happy with Andreas's proposed 0th-iter scope desugaring, modulo nagging doubts that are going away even as I type.


particularly, when somebody who really wants per loop bindings they can easily say:

{ let i;
   for (;i<n;i++; {
    ...
   }
}
 
Allen