excluding features from sloppy mode

Russell Leggett russell.leggett at gmail.com
Fri Dec 28 09:17:19 PST 2012


On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Kevin Smith <khs4473 at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Sorry, I should have expanded further - that was my point. Node is a case
>> where I can see classes being used without modules. I imagine native class
>> support will hit v8 soon enough, and I could see people start using them
>> without trying to switch to ES6 modules.
>>
>
> Ah - true.  They can put a "use strict" at the top if they want that.
>  Honestly, though, won't Node users be the first to start coding in ES6
> modules?
>

I guess we'll see soon enough, but I think there's still going to be a big
battle between ES6 modules and node modules and amd/requireJS. Any early
adopter types have already probably invested in something, and because the
porting isn't always straightforward, I think many will stick with what
they've got for a while. I'd honestly really like to start using ES6
modules soon, but I'm still racking my brain for the right way to do it,
because there are a lot of features I've built that are not compatible.

- Russ

>
> { Kevin }
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20121228/484a6b15/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list