Changing [[Prototype]]

Andreas Rossberg rossberg at google.com
Fri Dec 28 03:51:20 PST 2012


On 28 December 2012 11:51, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com> wrote:

> Le 28/12/2012 11:20, Brendan Eich a écrit :
>
>> David Bruant wrote:
>>
>>> What about a specific section of the spec called "de facto standards"?
>>> It would indicate that it's part of the standard, but is a scar from
>>> history rather than a legit feature.
>>> An intro would explain what this is all about.
>>> It would be an interesting middleground between normal spec features
>>> (which people take for the Holy Graal) and appendices (which people will
>>> skip).
>>> __{define|lookup}{G|S}etter__ would fit well in this section.
>>>
>> Those never made it into IE. Why include them? There's a bright line
>> drawn by interop.
>>
> I've seen Node.js code with it.


That's a good point, actually. I, for one, do not understand the criteria
by which we chose to include __proto__ but not __defineGetter__ and friends.

/Andreas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20121228/83e91173/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list