excluding features from sloppy mode (was: the 1JS experiment has failed)
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Wed Dec 26 19:35:35 PST 2012
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 4:59 PM, David Herman <dherman at mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Dec 26, 2012, at 3:35 PM, Mark S. Miller <erights at google.com> wrote:
>> I think you did coin "1JS". What do you mean by it? Does it bear on
>> the present issue or not?
> And it got shortened to 1JS not long after (maybe in the same thread?). The key point was no (new) opt-in for ES6. If you read the message (see the "Modules as the opt-in for new semantics" section), you'll see that I actually proposed that anything that can't be made to work in legacy code can be left out of sloppy mode.
Excellent. Thanks for the clarification. Sorry again for the confusion.
More information about the es-discuss