Conditional catch clause

Herby Vojčík herby at mailbox.sk
Wed Dec 19 23:31:36 PST 2012



Brendan Eich wrote:
> John J Barton wrote:
>> Unless we have foolishly polluted our error handling mechanism with
>> non-errors.
>
> Exception-handling > error-handling. Perhaps we disagree, but it's not
> called "error-handling" -- it is called "exception handling" for good
> reason. Exceptional conditions are not all errors.

But polluting single physical channel with all the orthogonal logical 
channels is at least questionable, isn't it? Is the idea 9f multiple 
channels (as I posted a few mails ago) not a possibility>

> /be

Herby


More information about the es-discuss mailing list