Fwd: Function identity of non-configurable accessors

Brendan Eich brendan at mozilla.com
Tue Dec 18 09:08:06 PST 2012

Mark S. Miller wrote:
> That could work, but because of its complexity, I'm leaning back 
> towards the "configurable data property that refuses to be configured" 
> approach. Is there a problem with that? It self-hosts fine.

Certainly this is the simplest solution. It has a slight smell, but no 
worse than the others'!


More information about the es-discuss mailing list