A DOM use case that can't be emulated with direct proxies

David Bruant bruant.d at gmail.com
Fri Dec 14 15:53:41 PST 2012

Le 14/12/2012 19:04, Mark S. Miller a écrit :
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mark Miller <erights at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Andreas Rossberg <rossberg at google.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 14 December 2012 16:54, Mark Miller <erights at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Regarding what Andreas said and what Alex +1ed, we already have
>>>> precedent.
>>>> We already argued through this precedent in committee and agreed. I like
>>>> David's suggestion about how to organize these tests.
>>> Hm, unless you are talking about intl402, I wasn't aware of that.
>>> What's the precedent?
>> I will find it when I have time. If anyone else finds it first, please post
>> a link. Thanks.
> http://hg.ecmascript.org/tests/test262/file/c84161250e66/test/suite/ch15/15.2/15.2.3/
Yes, this probably belongs somewhere else that the ch15 directory.
For any other ECMAScript 5.1 implementation, there is no particular 
reason to consider the "document" global differently than any other.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list