(Map|Set|WeakMap)#set() returns `this` ?
waldron.rick at gmail.com
Wed Dec 5 20:05:34 PST 2012
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Bill Frantz <frantz at pwpconsult.com> wrote:
> On 12/5/12 at 1:50 AM, jussi.kalliokoski at gmail.com (Jussi Kalliokoski)
> I personally think returning `this` in absence of any meaningful value
>> chaining in general) is a bad pattern.
> I have to agree with Jussi here. Whenever I consider chaining using the
> returned values from the various things called, my programming paranoia
> hair stands on end. Let me try to explain:
> Whenever I program, I try to trust as little code as possible. With
> chaining, there are two possibilities for getting the wrong answer in the
> returned value:
> * I or someone else wrote it, but screwed up,
> * Someone hostile wrote it and is trying to trip me up.
> If there is a language construct that allows chaining -- like the Pascal
> "with" construct -- then I am only trusting the language*, not other
> fragments of programs. If I depend on things I call returning the correct
> "this", then I am depending on them and my dependency set is a lot larger.
> A larger dependency set makes me nervous.
> Cheers - Bill
> * For the really paranoid, minimizing the parts of the language depended
> on is important. Not all JS implementations behave the same way in the
> corner cases.
Again, I reject the notion that "someone might screw up" is a valid
argument for this, or any, discussion. It's one thing to be aware of the
potential for misuse, but entirely another to succumb to "fear driven
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss