new strawman: syntactic support for private names
allen at wirfs-brock.com
Wed Aug 29 09:43:53 PDT 2012
On Aug 29, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Herby Vojčík wrote:
> Yes, I also would like to know why this simpler older model was not good enough.
See my reply to Axel. If you are referring to a simpler older model using the @ sigil, note that we don't actually have one. As far as I'm aware, this is the first complete strawman @ based proposal.
More information about the es-discuss