=?utf-8?Q?What=E2=80=99s_?=the best name for keyword parameters?

Rick Waldron waldron.rick at gmail.com
Mon Aug 6 13:46:02 PDT 2012



On Monday, August 6, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Axel Rauschmayer wrote:

> I agree. It would still be nice if we could find a common way of talking about this pattern (*in* the common lexicon). With the additional ES.next support, it is bound to become even more popular. It can feel like bikeshedding, but I think good naming matters. For example, I’m thankful for the term IIFE.
>  
>  

Ben Alman coined this, not the spec.

Rick
  
>  
> On Aug 3, 2012, at 10:34 , Alex Russell <alex at dojotoolkit.org (mailto:alex at dojotoolkit.org)> wrote:
> > There is a long history of TC39 naming things for internal use and those names never escaping to the common lexicon. I'm not sure it's a thing we need to (or even should) weigh in on via the spec.
>  
> --  
> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
> axel at rauschma.de (mailto:axel at rauschma.de)
>  
> home: rauschma.de (http://rauschma.de)twitter: twitter.com/rauschma (http://twitter.com/rauschma)
> blog: 2ality.com (http://2ality.com)
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
>  
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120806/cae0522f/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list