A few arrow function specification issues

Kevin Smith khs4473 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 06:44:35 PDT 2012

> I'd prefer if concise method syntax stayed simple syntactic sugar for
> functions. Methods obviously need dynamic this. If you combine that
> with changes like the above, then you have implicitly introduced a
> third kind of function that cannot be described as (simple) syntactic
> sugar for any of the other two. That would be unfortunate, IMO.

FWIW, I agree.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120423/e853b75b/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list