A few arrow function specification issues
khs4473 at gmail.com
Mon Apr 23 06:44:35 PDT 2012
> I'd prefer if concise method syntax stayed simple syntactic sugar for
> functions. Methods obviously need dynamic this. If you combine that
> with changes like the above, then you have implicitly introduced a
> third kind of function that cannot be described as (simple) syntactic
> sugar for any of the other two. That would be unfortunate, IMO.
FWIW, I agree.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss