A few arrow function specification issues
khs4473 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 21 19:20:43 PDT 2012
> I understand your argument, but I think it is more important to be able to
> switch in full to the new function operator(s), not sometimes one, other
> times the other.
Why? Arrow functions and traditional functions serve different semantic
purposes. Why is it important to you that we essentially deprecate
traditional 'function' syntax?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss