A few arrow function specification issues

Kevin Smith khs4473 at gmail.com
Sat Apr 21 19:20:43 PDT 2012

> I understand your argument, but I think it is more important to be able to
> switch in full to the new function operator(s), not sometimes one, other
> times the other.

Why?  Arrow functions and traditional functions serve different semantic
purposes.  Why is it important to you that we essentially deprecate
traditional 'function' syntax?

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120421/5f7d6b9d/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list