callable objects ?

Mark S. Miller erights at google.com
Tue Apr 17 14:20:45 PDT 2012


+1 for simple enough. It's also shorter (12 vs 20)

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.org> wrote:

> Brendan Eich wrote:
>
>> This last point is important: we do not want an object's typeof-type to
>> change by giving it a @call property. But we do want to enable call and
>> construct protocols to be built by users, by giving objects @call and
>> @construct properties.
>>
>
> I did not include an Object.isCallable(v) API that returns true if (@call
> in v), but we could add that. Testing (@call in v) seems simple enough.
>
>
> /be
> ______________________________**_________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/**listinfo/es-discuss<https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss>
>



-- 
    Cheers,
    --MarkM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120417/99962b54/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list