try without catch or finally

Domenic Denicola domenic at
Tue Apr 17 13:43:21 PDT 2012

Tangentially related:

From: es-discuss-bounces at [es-discuss-bounces at] on behalf of Nebojša Ćirić [cira at]
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2012 16:39
To: Jussi Kalliokoski
Cc: es-discuss
Subject: Re: try without catch or finally

It's easy to forget to catch in cases you wanted to.

Maybe adding a new keyword:

try {
} drop;

17. април 2012. 13.35, Jussi Kalliokoski <jussi.kalliokoski at<mailto:jussi.kalliokoski at>> је написао/ла:
I'm not sure if this has been discussed before, but is it a terribly bad idea to make catch/finally optional for a try block?

There's a lot of code like this out there:

try { /* something here */ } catch (e) { /* nothing here */ }


es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss at<mailto:es-discuss at>

Nebojša Ćirić
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list