Even simpler lambdas
Tab Atkins Jr.
jackalmage at gmail.com
Tue Apr 17 09:05:18 PDT 2012
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Peter van der Zee <ecma at qfox.nl> wrote:
> Why can't lambda's be a simple case of a lexically scoped `return`
> keyword with any arguments implicitly defined and accessible through a
> predefined identifier/keyword (much like `arguments` works now)?
> arr.map(return '<'+arguments+'
This doesn't seem simpler than:
arr.map((x,y)=> '<' + x + 'class="' + this.getClassName(y) + '"/>');
Your other variants that shorten the 'arguments' name are better, but
don't appear to offer much of a win. They also prevent you from using
the argument list to good effect, such as by giving them descriptive
names or using destructuring and rest args.
I'm not generally a fan of overloading keywords with multiple distinct
meanings. It makes the language harder to read.
More information about the es-discuss