Complete Minimal Classes
herby at mailbox.sk
Sat Apr 7 01:22:36 PDT 2012
Kevin Smith wrote:
> Arbitrary prototype properties is surely to draw fire. It can be a
> foot-gun and might conflict with instance properties in the future.
> Foot gun: yes. I've shot myself in the foot with it. But I think it
> can be addressed in a way that's footgun-proof. We're going to need
Nothing of real value (and power) can be footgun-proof.
I value expressivity and power in a programming language a lot over
footgun-proofness (no more Java, thanks).
More information about the es-discuss