Digraphs *and* Unicode pretty-glyphs, for arrows, triangle, etc.

John Tamplin jat at google.com
Thu Apr 5 08:29:07 PDT 2012

On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Adam Shannon <adam at ashannon.us> wrote:

> I don't see anything inherently wrong with adding some nice sugar to
> ES, because the people who will be using this "math heavy" notation
> will be those who are used to it. The "everyday" ecmascript programmer
> probably won't touch these because they might add extra work for them.
> Plus, it'd be nice to be able to read math in ES (for us math oriented
> folk).

So what about people editing code written by others?  Will they have to run
the source through some transformation tool to get the ASCII operators back?

John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120405/07ce3b87/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list