Digraphs *and* Unicode pretty-glyphs, for arrows, triangle, etc.

John Tamplin jat at google.com
Thu Apr 5 08:29:07 PDT 2012


On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Adam Shannon <adam at ashannon.us> wrote:

> I don't see anything inherently wrong with adding some nice sugar to
> ES, because the people who will be using this "math heavy" notation
> will be those who are used to it. The "everyday" ecmascript programmer
> probably won't touch these because they might add extra work for them.
> Plus, it'd be nice to be able to read math in ES (for us math oriented
> folk).


So what about people editing code written by others?  Will they have to run
the source through some transformation tool to get the ASCII operators back?

-- 
John A. Tamplin
Software Engineer (GWT), Google
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20120405/07ce3b87/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list