Digraphs *and* Unicode pretty-glyphs, for arrows, triangle, etc.

Corey Richardson corey at octayn.net
Thu Apr 5 05:57:23 PDT 2012

On Wed, 4 Apr 2012 23:54:54 -0700, Norbert Lindenberg <ecmascript at norbertlindenberg.com> wrote:
> Besides typing, legibility is critical: ⇒, ≥, ≤ are clearly improvements
> over their ASCII counterparts, but ≠ and ≢ are too hard to tell apart.

I use a monospace font when programming, like many people. Those characters
are so small at my prefered font sizes for me to be comfortable using it or
seeing it in code, I'd always translate back to the "normal" notation.

More information about the es-discuss mailing list