Development Mode/Production Mode
bruant.d at gmail.com
Tue Apr 3 08:16:56 PDT 2012
Le 03/04/2012 17:12, John J Barton a écrit :
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 7:03 AM, David Bruant <bruant.d at gmail.com
> <mailto:bruant.d at gmail.com>> wrote:
> Le 01/04/2012 13:38, Wes Garland a écrit :
> In a similar vein, I would personally like to have
> zero-cost-when-not-debugging assert() statements, and am
> hopeful that statically-linked modules might lead the way.
> It seems to me that what you're asking for is macros, isn't it?
> I read hints here and there that it's a very hard problem that is
> being worked on for a later ES version.
> Since most JS is compiled in the run time, macros are not zero cost.
"As a data point, we compile all our code through Mozilla's SpiderMonkey
engine with JSOPTION_STRICT, which pre-dates ES5 strict mode, during our
It seems to me that it would be equivalent work to remove macros with
such a compilation phase, making the macro cost effectively zero in
> Since most JS runs in a sophisticated JIT capable of dead code
> const debug = false;
Macros would probably also be less intrusive than a top-scope variable,
but I may be wrong on this part.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss