Sep 27 meeting notes

Allen Wirfs-Brock allen at
Thu Sep 29 18:45:44 PDT 2011

On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 16:54, Brendan Eich <brendan at> wrote:
>> On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:22 AM, Erik Arvidsson wrote:
>> ...
>> A "static" keyword is at this point traditional, but we all hate it.
>> Are we being too pure?
>> /be
> I would also be fine with a special class body.
> I'm also fine with 'static'. Like everybody, I don't really like the
> name but it is the best we have at the moment.

Personally, I would choose no support at all for class-side properties if the only other option was calling them "static".  I find the use of that keyword for this meaning at least as objectionable as other have found, for example, optional commas after object literal methods.


More information about the es-discuss mailing list