# proposal extensions (Was: Re: Sep 26 meeting notes)

[Brendan Eich]

On Sep 29, 2011, at 11:03 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:

>> Probably shouldn't have <| for value types either then right ?
> 
> That's right, they are not objects.

Or hrm, now that you mention it Allen did spec these, and they get wrapped implicitly (string "foo" becomes new String("foo"), etc.).

I still find implicit primitive wrapping where the wrapper is observable raises my hackles. Anyone feel the same?

/be