__proto__ in Annex B (was: Re: Sep 27 meeting notes)
Geoffrey Sneddon
gsneddon at opera.com
Thu Sep 29 10:54:07 PDT 2011
On 28/09/11 00:06, Waldemar Horwat wrote:
> Should we standardize __proto__ in Annex B?
> MarkM + a few others: Yes
> Waldemar, Doug: No
Unless we have a definite plan that no ES.Next impl will support
__proto__, then by all means don't standardize it. However, seeming the
conclusion before was that not all use-cases of __proto__ are handled
currently, once they are addressed in ES.Next, there will still be some
transitional phase. I'd rather specify it in ES.Next, even if we do then
agree to drop it in ES.(Next+1).
That said about any transitional phase, if it turns out we can make it
[[Writable: false]] in ES.Next, then all the better (thereby only
providing a transitional phase for those who can already use
Object.getPrototypeOf).
--
Geoffrey Sneddon — Opera Software
<http://gsnedders.com>
<http://opera.com>
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list