Can we call it ECMAScript 6, yet?
allen at wirfs-brock.com
Mon Sep 19 13:36:52 PDT 2011
On Sep 19, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> You're right that the safer course is ES.next until we're further along. When is "further along" in your view?
One approach is to not describe a features as "being in ES6" until after it first appears in an actual ES6 draft. From that perspective, what is currently "in" (or at least will be as soon as I upload a new draft) are let/const/function block scoped declarations, destructuring assignment/declarations/parameters, default parameter values, and the rest parameter. Probably a few other really minor things, too.
More information about the es-discuss