Can we call it ECMAScript 6, yet?

[Allen Wirfs-Brock]

On Sep 19, 2011, at 3:05 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:

> 
> You're right that the safer course is ES.next until we're further along. When is "further along" in your view?
> 

One approach is to not describe a features as "being in ES6"  until after it first appears in an actual ES6 draft.   From that perspective, what is currently "in" (or at least will be as soon as I upload a new draft) are let/const/function block scoped declarations, destructuring assignment/declarations/parameters, default parameter values, and the rest parameter. Probably a few other really minor things, too.

Allen