Can we call it ECMAScript 6, yet?

[Allen Wirfs-Brock]

I'd recommend sticking sticking with "ES.next" as much as possible.  Everything is still subject to change and there remains a lot of opportunity for creating confusion by talking about what is "in" ES6.

Allen





On Sep 19, 2011, at 12:54 PM, Rick Waldron wrote:

> It appears that ES6 is ok: http://www.slideshare.net/BrendanEich/capitol-js
> 
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Axel Rauschmayer <axel at rauschma.de> wrote:
> Or is ECMAScript.next still the better term?
> 
> --
> Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
> 
> axel at rauschma.de
> twitter.com/rauschma
> 
> home: rauschma.de
> blog: 2ality.com
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
> 
> _______________________________________________
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20110919/e0062e04/attachment-0001.html>