Can we call it ECMAScript 6, yet?

Axel Rauschmayer axel at rauschma.de
Mon Sep 19 09:53:47 PDT 2011

Previous message: [Harmony proxies] Thoughts on the almost-dead "receiver" argument
Next message: Can we call it ECMAScript 6, yet?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Or is ECMAScript.next still the better term?

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer

axel at rauschma.de
twitter.com/rauschma

home: rauschma.de
blog: 2ality.com

Previous message: [Harmony proxies] Thoughts on the almost-dead "receiver" argument
Next message: Can we call it ECMAScript 6, yet?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the es-discuss mailing list