An Introduction to JS-Ctypes
brendan at mozilla.com
Sun Sep 18 06:14:55 PDT 2011
On Sep 18, 2011, at 5:07 AM, Andrea Giammarchi wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 7:17 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> The point is that you don't *have* to pass a fresh object literal to each constructor call.
> I know Brendan, my point is that I can predict devs will do every time .... we'll see
> Thanks for other reply, I thought named arguments where proposed tho ... any chance we can discuss this somehow ? ( not here )
Can't use =, that is just the assignment operator, so
foo(a = 1, b = 2)
is the same as
(a = 1, b = 2, foo(a, b))
We'd need some new operator or punctuator, e.g.
foo(a: 1, b: 2)
foo(a => 1, b => 2) // clashes with arrow function syntax
Anyway, this only helps for the "top ply" of the object/array tree containing values to store as binary data. You'd still have object and array literals starting one ply down.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss