On object extension
raynos2 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 13:13:07 PST 2011
> Current proposal would turn a configurable non-writable property into a
>> writable property which is not a silent error, but rather a big mistake.
> If that is the case then I agree that would be bad. Whether we want to
> throw an error or silently do a no-op is another discussion.
> Given that it would throw if any of the 3 (or n) properties your trying to
> extend fails it would make more sense to have a silent no-op as a default.
> This way the other property extensions succeed.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss