The class operator: a bridge between object and function exemplers
brendan at mozilla.com
Thu Nov 17 14:05:28 PST 2011
On Nov 17, 2011, at 9:04 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
> OK, I have a fix for the missing constructor problem. See: http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=strawman:class_operator#missing_constructors
Nit: [[ctor]], obviously a temporary hack-name. How about [[ClassConstructor]]? or maybe [[DefaultConstructor]]?
Non-nit: don't we want inherited 'constructor' to work, unless it has the value Object?
> On Nov 15, 2011, at 9:25 AM, Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
>> On Nov 15, 2011, at 8:16 AM, Russell Leggett wrote:
>>> As has been said, a missing constructor would not result in the expected behavior. I can also imagine other scenarios where the behavior would be unusual.
>> I agree, there is an issue with missing constructors. Certainly my example were assume that it would never be missing from objects would be used as object exemplars.
>> It's pretty clear that to solve this (if it is solvable) requires a more complex definition of the class operator. I'm thinking about that now. You examples are helpful...
>> es-discuss mailing list
>> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss