Alternative syntax for <|

Brendan Eich brendan at mozilla.com
Wed Nov 16 22:53:03 PST 2011


On Nov 16, 2011, at 9:31 PM, David Herman wrote:

> On Nov 16, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:
> 
>> Yes, I understand, but it doesn't answer the question -- why do we need _additional_ keyword
> 
> Infix operators can be conditional keywords. That's the current plan for is, IINM.

and isnt.

http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=harmony:egal

/be


More information about the es-discuss mailing list