Dmitry Soshnikov dmitry.soshnikov at gmail.com
Tue Nov 15 06:17:33 PST 2011

On 15.11.2011 18:13, Jake Verbaten wrote:
>     Even with adding properties to objects (which is a no-no for
>     ES.next), dynamic super is never particularly elegant. This was
>     the best solution I could come up with and it’s not pretty:
>     https://gist.github.com/1331748

Is it based on the technique I showed before? Nice :) Though, where is 
the reference on the author, you cheat? :D

> If we could get away with manipulating the prototype chain at run time 
> then super can be implemented as https://gist.github.com/1367167
> The idea of temporarily plucking the current [[Prototype]] out of the 
> chain, is how I envision super should work.

Yeah-yeah, again -- we all agree that we already have nice class-sugar 
for 98% percents of case in the _production_ programming. If the 
standard will ever standardize it, I'd like to see the sugar, but not 
the syntactically odd stuff. So, besides solving the 1-2% issues, the 
syntax we need (hello, Coffee).

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20111115/931482b2/attachment.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list