r-proto-class

Jake Verbaten raynos2 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 15 06:05:18 PST 2011


>
> Anyway, once again, the main point I wanted to note, is that we _already_
> may have more-less good classes via libs with more-less acceptable
> convenient super-calls. The standardized version should be better that all
> the libs. I.e.: (1) not to have the issue you describe and (2) which IMO
> even more important -- to be _really_ a sugar, but not syntactically odd
> stuff.
>

Correct, we can implement these patterns, we just need a standardization
mechanism, so that we no longer have hundreds of versions of this pattern.

I too believe that class is only sugar, however we do want to add new
syntax to object literals.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20111115/5ce99c90/attachment.html>


More information about the es-discuss mailing list