On class literals possibly not making it into ECMAScript.next

Axel Rauschmayer axel at rauschma.de
Fri Nov 4 08:00:11 PDT 2011

But isn’t jQuery.bar() just a work-around, because JavaScript does not have modules, yet?

On Oct 30, 2011, at 21:05 , Rick Waldron wrote:

> This pattern makes is _very_ easy for newer developers/adopters to understand the division of functionality:
> - DOM methods here: jQuery().foo()
> - Everything else here: jQuery.bar()

Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de

home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20111104/7397baf5/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the es-discuss mailing list