Yet another class declaration proposal

[Axel Rauschmayer]

I agree 100%. I still hope that object exemplars will become part of the language. However they *are* introducing a completely new way of implementing types (or rather, of naming exemplars). That is bound to be a deal-breaker for many. Thus, if I can’t have object exemplars, I’ll settle for the second-best thing: class declarations that look and feel just like them.

Axel

On Nov 3, 2011, at 17:52 , Jake Verbaten wrote:

> I like this one mainly for the line
> 
> class declarations and object literals should have the same features
> 
> However if they have the same features then why bother with class at all.
> 
> Why not just have 
> 
> let Monster = Being <| { ... }
> 
> This way we don't introduce the class keyword which is confusing and loaded with assumptions about what it does and means.
> 
> https://gist.github.com/1336846

-- 
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
axel at rauschma.de

home: rauschma.de
twitter: twitter.com/rauschma
blog: 2ality.com



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20111103/39b492da/attachment-0001.html>