Loyal Opposition to Const, Private, Freeze, Non-Configurable, Non-Writable...

Quildreen Motta quildreen at gmail.com
Wed Nov 2 12:45:42 PDT 2011

On 02/11/11 17:00, John J Barton wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Quildreen Motta<quildreen at gmail.com>  wrote:
>> Imho, no users *SHOULD* use Object.create directly. That's why abstractions
>> exist —
> Of course I agree with you!
>> and first class functions make it easy enough to make them.
> But if we had Crockford's Object.create() rather than the one you
> don't want us to use we would not need the class goop ;-)
> Anyway this is all wishful thinking. Languages don't get simpler.
> jjb
Racket seems simple as fuck to me :3 So does Haskell.

More information about the es-discuss mailing list