May 24-26 rough meeting notes

Tue May 31 23:21:00 PDT 2011

On May 31, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Kam Kasravi wrote:

> Is it a given that the grammar extensions in the various strawmen are all LR(1)? 

See earlier in this thread, where this strawman was mentioned as requiring either a cover grammar for ArrowFormalParameters (namely Expression), plus a restriction against arrow block body being a block-with-labeled-statement-as-first-child -- or else GLR or PEG or something that is not going to fly in the spec.

/be
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.mozilla.org/pipermail/es-discuss/attachments/20110531/ff91ef15/attachment.html>