May 24-26 rough meeting notes
Peter Michaux
petermichaux at gmail.com
Sat May 28 11:32:50 PDT 2011
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Waldemar <waldemar at google.com> wrote:
> Versioning:
> <script type="application/ecmascript;version=6"> (RFC 4329)
> use version 6;
> module LOL {
> ...
> }
> </script>
> There are good reasons to have the metadata both externally (in the script
> tag) and internally (in the script). External versioning allows
> implementations to avoid fetching a script at all if they won't understand
> it. Internal versioning helps in the case where the external version is
> detached.
>
> Brendan's idea:
> <script-if type=...>
> ...
> <script-elif type=...>
> ...
> <script-else>
> ...
> </script>
>
> Consensus on moving some form of versioning into Harmony. The strawman is a
> bit light at this time, so no specifics yet.
A lot of the above looks like HTML. Isn't versioning that depends on
HTML out of scope for the ECMAScript standard?
Peter
More information about the es-discuss
mailing list