alex at dojotoolkit.org
Sat May 21 10:38:53 PDT 2011
On May 21, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Peter Michaux wrote:
> That is not what I wrote at all because I didn't write the "it could be better".
> wrote that C# delegates were not popular in C# 2.0. Functions are
So you were only arguing that his analogy was flawed in that the cause of the current proposal isn't under-use but rather problems borne from over-use? Fair enough. It's not an argument against the proposal, then, and I misread it. Apologies.
> On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Alex Russell <alex at dojotoolkit.org> wrote:
>> I'm sorry, this this argument is entirely circular:
>> - we have something that works
>> - it could be better
>> - but it works, so we don't need anything better
>> On May 21, 2011, at 10:08 AM, Peter Michaux wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 12:44 PM, Nathan Stott <nrstott at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Having worked a lot with C#, my experience was that very very few
>>>> people used the C# 2.0 delegate syntax and now a large portion of the
>>>> community learned and uses the C# 3.0 syntax. Syntax matters.
>>> their syntax. Function expressions are already wildly popular in
slightlyoff at google.com
slightlyoff at chromium.org
alex at dojotoolkit.org BE03 E88D EABB 2116 CC49 8259 CF78 E242 59C3 9723
More information about the es-discuss