Use cases for WeakMap
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Sat May 14 16:24:57 PDT 2011
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Oliver Hunt <oliver at apple.com> wrote:
> On May 14, 2011, at 4:03 PM, David Bruant wrote:
> > Le 15/05/2011 01:01, Oliver Hunt a écrit :
> >> No, I am wrong, if i have a key that i can ever reuse, the map is
> strong, because the key will keep the value live. These aren't weak maps,
> they are strong maps that don't leak keys that have become dead.
> >> I can kind of see the value of this kind of structure, but I don't
> believe it is a WeakMap.
> > What is your definition of a WeakMap?
> > How is the current strawman different from this definition?
> In the definition of a weak map that I have always known, the key does not
> keep the mapped value alive. In the weakmaps proposal the key keeps the
> mapped value alive.
Is there some prior system that refers to these as WeakMaps?
> So if you can ever lookup a key again, the value cannot be collected, so
> your "cache" will hold onto every entry forever.
> > David
> es-discuss mailing list
> es-discuss at mozilla.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss