Native JS Encryption
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Sat Mar 19 10:09:07 PDT 2011
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2011, at 9:31 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Brendan Eich <brendan at mozilla.com> wrote:
>> Mark Miller alluded to a crypto API task group without Ecma TC39. I'm open
>> to it, provided we can include some of the domain experts who have
>> participated on this list (but who may not be employed by Ecma members).
> "without"? I'm not sure what you mean by this, so I don't know if it's what
> I intended to allude to ;).
> Whoops -- typo'ed "within". Big difference!
> Hope the remaining context pointed to the typo. I wouldn't worry about
> non-members attending otherwise.
Good. That's what I intended to allude to. I think a crypto task group could
follow the same model that i18n is following -- towards stdization of a
document separate from 262 but within tc39.
I agree about outside domain experts. In fact, I wish we could invite
outside domain experts participate in all tc39 activities as we deem
appropriate. I do not understand the rationale for bounding invited expert
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss