Making "super" work outside a literal?

Brendan Eich brendan at mozilla.com
Sat Jun 25 14:45:02 PDT 2011


On Jun 25, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:

>> We should discuss this more concise 'super'-only, not 'super.foo' idea. Is it only for conciseness, or is the fact that it does not support 'super.bar' from within a method named 'foo' important?
> 
> Of course it's mostly for conciseness. 

I don't think it's just about conciseness. See my last message.

/be



More information about the es-discuss mailing list