Making "super" work outside a literal?
brendan at mozilla.com
Sat Jun 25 14:45:02 PDT 2011
On Jun 25, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Dmitry A. Soshnikov wrote:
>> We should discuss this more concise 'super'-only, not 'super.foo' idea. Is it only for conciseness, or is the fact that it does not support 'super.bar' from within a method named 'foo' important?
> Of course it's mostly for conciseness.
I don't think it's just about conciseness. See my last message.
More information about the es-discuss