[Harmony Proxies] Proposal: Property fixing
Mark S. Miller
erights at google.com
Thu Jun 16 19:23:23 PDT 2011
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Allen Wirfs-Brock <allen at wirfs-brock.com>wrote:
> On Jun 16, 2011, at 6:52 PM, Mark S. Miller wrote:
> > [object a] → [object b] → [Object prototype object] → null
> > a is a proxy object and b is a normal object. If you define a non-
> > configurable property on b, and you look up that property on a, can it
> > still be reported as non-configurable?
> Perhaps I'm missing something here, but isn't the only way to actually
> inspect (report?) the attributes of a property is via
> Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor so you can't use a to inspect the attributes
> of a property of b, regardless or whether or not b is a Proxy. I believe
> that the only operations on a that are sensitive to the value of the
> configurable attribute only apply to own properties.
Was true until <
we should simply withdraw the getPropertyDescriptor trap and avoid the whole
problem? When in doubt, leave it out.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the es-discuss